210-250 dumps 210-255 dumps 200-150 dumps 200-155pdf 300-160 dumps 300-165 dumps 300-170 dumps 300-175 dumps 300-180 dumps 300-210 dumps 010-151 Dumps 010-151-dumps 070-461-dumps 1V0-603-dumps 1Z0-052-dumps 1z0-067-dumps 1z0-434-dumps 1Z0-804-dumps 1z0-883-dumps 220-801-dumps 220-901-dumps 220-902-dumps 300-085-dumps 300-365-dumps 312-50-dumps 70-698 dumps 70-734 dumps 70-741 dumps 70-742 dumps 70-743 dumps 70-761 dumps 70-764 dumps 70-767 dumps 70-765 dumps 70-740 dumps 70-357 dumps 70-773 dumps 70-774 dumps 70-775 dumps 642-883 dumps 810-403 dumps 300-365 dumps 300-550 dumps 640-875 dumps 70-342 dumps 70-346 dumps 70-347 dumps

Most University Leaders Involved in Setting Their Own Pay


The University and College Union (UCU) recently sent a freedom of information (FOI) request. The union represents university staff and the request comes when industrial action by staff is imminent. Whilst there is a dispute over pensions, the request found that 95% of university leaders are involved with the establishment of their wages.

University Leaders Aren’t Transparent About Their Wages

Most university leaders are members of a remuneration committee which decides their salary. Those who aren’t part of the committee are still allowed to attend the meetings that set their pay. The finding was driven by concerns about the fairness of executive salaries. This information  comes when university staff are set to take strike action in a dispute over their pension.

Too Many University Leaders Are Involved

Out of the 158 institutions that were surveyed, only seven vice-chancellors were not allowed to have any involvement with the remuneration committee or meeting. Almost half of responses outlined that their vice-chancellors were part of the committees whilst 67% were still allowed to attend meetings.

Unfair Inflation

Critics have accused vice-chancellors of over inflating their own wages. The findings will only add to the present frustrations of students who incur masses of debt and staff who aren’t properly provided for. Also, there is a severe lack of transparency surrounding the meetings themselves, with only 40% of institutions involved submitted committee minutes, upon the request of the FOI. The other 55% refused to send their minutes.

Pressure for Change

Politicians have condemned extortionate vice-chancellors’ salaries and are pressuring for change. As a result, the Committee of University Chairs (CUC) made it clear that vice-chancellors should not be involved in the issuing of their salaries. This is up for consultation and expected to be implemented later in 2018. The Office For Students (the new universities regulator) has warned it will become involved the issue isn’t put into order.

Proper transparency is needed remuneration committees should not be treated as independent bodies for senior pay. Although politicians are pressuring for change, there haven’t been any implantations so far. There are hopes that the involvement of the Office for Students will be successful. For now, the main priority is to make the remuneration process fair whilst holding vice-chancellors to account. Senior leaders should have their pay reviewed and committees should justify their decisions.

 

Newsletter